Head Master Simon Everson Reflects on the Real Value of Education
Independent schools are very much in the crosshairs of the government. We face a future in which the government intends to add VAT at 20% to the cost of school fees. Further, they intend to do so in January 2025, at exceptionally short notice.
One might reasonably ask why they have picked out independent education as a focus of their dislike. In our society, all kinds of luxury and even advantage can be bought and sold. Noone sensible is proposing that we add VAT to private medicine — indeed, private healthcare will probably be used to support the NHS. Nor is there a clamour to get rid of first-class travel or five-star hotels. However, purchasing an excellent education is perceived to be in a different category from buying a nicer holiday or faster healthcare. The purchase of a better education is seen as an advantage that will echo through the life of the child, transforming his or her life opportunities for the better. It is the archetypal gift that keeps giving. To quote the lyrics of The Jam’s song Eton Rifles (referring, of course, to Eton College), ‘What chance have you got against a tie and a crest?’.
Of course, this ignores the ways in which independent schools support a wide network of state schools, both primary and secondary. Independent schools want every child to benefit from that ‘tie and crest’; each has a vast array of activities and partnerships. At ÍÃ×ÓÏÈÉú’ up to a thousand stateschool pupils have used our facilities over the course of a week. We assist state schools with applications to Oxbridge and medical colleges. We train staff at other schools to teach Science and Maths. Local primaries take part in orchestras, joint musical events and in special learning days. Sixth Formers visit local primary schools to offer teaching in robotics, Latin and Computing. We also offer our facilities and support outdoor activities in our school grounds.
With the advent of VAT, I am even more mindful of my school’s duty to provide value for money. The judgment of whether something is good value is not objective. It is not associated with some sweet spot on a graph where two lines of numerical value cross. It is to do with perception, opinion and even a sense of shared endeavour. We are dependent upon a delighted parental body who remain willing to pay their child’s school fees. The Governors have agreed to lower our school fees to mitigate the extra 20% the VAT will add to a fee; the effect on parents will be equivalent to an extra 15%.
A good way to express the idea of good value is ‘a dram’ of whisky. Imagine that a guest arrives in a Scottish home, and hospitality is called for. A dram is the exact amount of whisky that the guest is pleased to receive, and the host is pleased to pour. It is not defined in terms of fluid ounces, but in terms of shared hopes, expectations and obligations. Good value, for a school like ours, is determined by a complex interplay between what parents are prepared to pay, against what they expect their child to receive, modified by what the school is able to offer.
I am very aware that school fees are probably the biggest discretionary expenditure in the lives of the parents. Given such sums, no wonder that the parents’ expectations are so high and that further fee increases are so unwelcome.
In return, ÍÃ×ÓÏÈÉú’ offers much. We enjoy exceptional academic success; the pupils here make progress well in excess of expectation. They leave us with excellent qualifications, but also as well-rounded, confident, creative young men. A huge range of extra-curricular activities challenges and develops self-esteem, friendships, resilience, loyalty, team building, leadership – the ‘soft’ skills that are so important to the growth and development of the pupils.
Schools like ÍÃ×ÓÏÈÉú’ offer something very rare: success without excessive pressure; high levels of achievement, without sacrifice in breadth and depth. Underpinning it all is our core principle: to learn well, each child must be happy. One hopes that parents will still feel that they enjoy value for money.
School leaders are constrained in their provision of good value by the ways school finances are structured. Most of school expenditure goes on fixed costs. Of those fixed costs, the great majority is spent on staff salaries. The percentage will vary between schools but will be usually somewhere between 60% and 80% of expenditure. State schools will tend to be at the higher end of this range. In addition to staff salaries, there are other fixed costs. These include the maintenance of grounds or playing fields, regular refurbishment of buildings, the regular upgrade of IT resources and any contracts that the school has signed. The government has blithely said that schools should simply absorb the VAT. However, if I were to cast around for cuts in order to pass the savings on to parents, I must do so within a small percentage of the overall school budget. I would have to make very deep cuts in this discretionary spending for it to have any significant impact on the overall budget. The students would notice the difference.
Schools are not factories; teachers are not assembly-line workers. An efficient manufacturing process will produce an acceptable product at the smallest cost. If factory A can make a passable widget 50% more cheaply than factory B, then factory B will soon go out of business and the widget market will be cornered by factory A. The education of children is more complex. It is not about producing an acceptable product as cheaply as possible. It is about the transmission of wisdom between the generations: the intellectual and moral development of children. Such a process needs time, personal attention, high expectations and care. That is only possible if the context is right.
At present ÍÃ×ÓÏÈÉú’ is hugely oversubscribed and continues to grow in popularity. A recent survey of parental opinion made it clear that the school is considered ‘good value for money’ — a pleasing outcome, as we live or die by that assessment. A private education is certainly not cheap, and we never forget the sacrifice that parents make on behalf of their children in placing their faith in the school.
When I ask parents what they want for their child they tell me that their overriding priority is that their son is happy. We know that we have to move heaven and earth to allow our pupils the best opportunity to find academic success. However, we also know that the things the children will carry away from their education, when they have forgotten all they once knew about quadratic equations and Boyle’s Law, will be the intangibles. Have they learnt how to lead? Have they learnt how to serve? Have they learnt how to foster friendship? Have they learnt to trust themselves? Have they learnt to trust others? Have they learnt how to learn? And above all, the overarching question: have they learnt how to be happy? If we can deliver that, then we will have achieved value for money in the pupils’ education.
I still hope for a change in the attitude taken by Bridget Phillipson, the Secretary of State for Education, towards independent education. At present it seems to be encapsulated by the words of Sherlock Holmes describing Sebastian Moran, Moriarty’s right-hand man: ‘He was educated at Eton and at Oxford, so Watson, bring the gun’.
How much better if we could ally the resources that the private and state sectors can bring to bear. What if we were to consider the possible future partnership between the NHS and private health as a possible model for the future of our children’s education?
Concordia will be emailed to parents over the holidays and will also be available to view on the school website. If you would prefer a hard copy, please do email development@mtsn.org.uk and we will arrange it. OMTs will receive their copy in the post later in December.’
Other News